Offshore News blog posts all the latest news, articles and reports on the Offshore Banking world, including Offshore Finance, Offshore Credit Cards, Offshore Merchant Accounts, Tax Haven Companies and Offshore Investments.

 

Friday, May 06, 2005

Ireland opens internet only bank

By Deirdre McArdle, ElectricNews.net

Published Wednesday 4th May 2005 10:47 GMT

RaboDirect, a subsidiary of the Dutch online bank Rabobank, launched Ireland's first completely online bank yesterday.

The Dutch banking giant, which entered the Irish market in 1994 through an office in the Irish Financial Services Centre (IFSC), made its mark on the Irish market when it bought ACC Bank in 2002.

The bank will target Irish consumers with a purely internet bank, called RaboDirect.ie, which will initially offer a no-fee, no-charge deposit account with interest rates of three per cent - almost 10 times the standard rate, the bank said. There will be no minimum or maximum deposit and no penalties for early withdrawals. The bank will also offer Irish consumers the chance to invest in the managed funds market, with accounts with Robeco and Merrill Lynch that can be opened with around €100.

Advertising itself as a "straight talking" bank, RaboDirect's customer care centre will be based in Charlemont Place in Dublin 2 with opening hours of from 8 am to 8 pm Monday to Friday and from 10 am to 5 pm on Saturdays. To make lodgements customers can transfer their funds from their primary bank account to their RaboDirect savings account. Likewise, to make a withdrawal, customers can electronically transfer funds from their RaboDirect account to any other Irish bank account.

RaboDirect has also been quick to stress the security of its online banking offering. Online transactions with RaboDirect use a security system called the Digipass, which operates in such a way that the customer's online access code changes every 36 seconds. This type of system is in common usage worldwide but up until this point had not been available in Ireland, the bank said.

In launching in Ireland the bank hopes to target what it calls "a clear gap between the financial products and services currently available and what the public want," said Greg McAweeney, general manager of RaboDirect, speaking at the launch.

"As a virtual bank without the overheads of the more traditional bricks and mortar banks, we have many distinct advantages, which underpin our ability to consistently offer a higher rate without penalties, fees or charges. Our aim is to be the best buy by focusing on a competitive rate as well as being convenient, simple and transparent. In addition since we are not publicly quoted we are not shareholder driven and as a result all profits go into reserves, which in turn can be used to pay top level interest rates," McAweeney added.

Rabobank, which has been in operation for 10 years, has 1.9m customers in the Netherlands and 36,000 people with combined savings of more than €900m in Belgium.

Copyright © 2005, ElectricNews.Net

Related stories Brits fall prey to phishing http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/03/aol_phishing/ Trojan phishing suspect hauled in http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/04/estonian_trojan_suspect_cuffed/ Cops warn of internet fraud http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/03/29/police_warn_punters/

© Copyright 2005 The Register

Money laundering crooks face high-tech sleuths

By Daniel Sorid

BOSTON (Reuters) - Governments around the world have found a high-tech ally in their fight against tax cheats, money launderers, corporate crooks, and perhaps the most pernicious of all bureaucratic enemies, paperwork.

The technology, a computer language developed by accountants, turns financial information into the equivalent of a bar code, allowing software to scan and comprehend information that would otherwise be left for armies of analysts to re-type and sort out.

Extensible business reporting language, as it is called, is gaining a critical following inside the halls of government. Officials from Brussels to Washington have begun encouraging and requiring financial statements to be prepared in XBRL, to counter the cool reception so far in the business community.

"It's the killer technology," said Michael Bartell, the chief information officer of the Federal Deposit Insurance, the U.S. banking regulator, speaking at a conference on the technology held last week. "We are drowning in data. We're buying storage faster than we can cut the purchase orders."

The technology affixes digital "tags" to virtually every kind of financial information, making it possible for software to spot suspicious or erroneous information and flag reports for more thorough review. While all data can be stored electronically, XBRL provides a standard structure that can be run through many types of analytical software.

In October, after a year's delay, the FDIC will become the first federal agency to require XBRL reporting, a change that could cut weeks from the task of reviewing 9,000 quarterly bank reports and sharing them with the investing public.

A similar, but voluntary, programme is underway at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. tax authority, is exploring XBRL as a way to speed the hugely time-consuming task of auditing businesses.

The European Union is spending one million euros, or 675,000 pounds, to promote the technology across member states. Markets in Asia are also pressing forward with XBRL, hoping the technology can increase financial transparency in their markets. (Reuters, the news and data company, is also a backer of XBRL.)

The technology has also been put to use for more creative purposes. An anti-money laundering group in Spain wants to use XBRL to spot suspicious financial deals. Canada's environmental agency is exploring the technology for a program designed to highlight the business costs of pollution.

BUSINESSES RELUCTANT

Companies and investors have yet to embrace the technology, frustrating agencies like the U.S. SEC, whose voluntary XBRL program has been largely ignored.

"What we have yet to observe is an embracing of the standard by preparers, analysts and investors," said Peter Derby, the SEC's managing executive for operations.

That could change, as industry groups begin to encourage companies to consider the five-year-old technology.

"We're on the verge of a fundamental transformation of financial reporting," said Colleen Cunningham, the president of Financial Executives International, an association of executives from about 8,000 U.S. and Canadian companies.

"It will take time to gain traction, but once it does I think it will be a steamroller," she said.

The lack of voluntary participation has created a chicken-and-egg problem for XBRL. Since companies do not use it, there is almost no data for investors or regulators to analyse. Since regulators and investors have little chance to use XBRL, they have been slow to push companies to use it.

One possible explanation for the hesitance: XBRL is like a high-definition camera for financial results, as it shows all the wrinkles and bumps of a company's financial results in ways traditional data delivery did not. While some companies might appreciate the increased scrutiny as a way to get market attention, others might shy away from it.

The SEC's Derby said participation will follow once software to create XBRL filings, made by companies including Fujitsu and start-up Rivet Software, becomes easier to use. "XBRL does not yet present an off-the-shelf set of tools that preparers can utilise," he said.

Regulators should take a more aggressive stance by mandating XBRL, said Otmar Winzig, a vice president of Software AG, which is working with a German stock exchange on a pilot program for XBRL that has attracted just eight companies.

Bob Laux, Microsoft's director of external reporting, is one of the few supportive voices from the corporate community. The accounting profession, he said, "hasn't really changed in 75 years."

"Think of the medical industry and what they've done with technology," Laux said. "The accounting profession needs to step up and embrace that kind of change process."

© Reuters 2005. All Rights Reserved.

Sarbanes Oxley for IT security

By Mark Rasch, SecurityFocus

Published Tuesday 3rd May 2005 07:31 GMT

Comment

Sarbanes Oxley seems wholly focused on the accuracy of a company's financial records and controls around these records, so where does IT security come into the picture, ask SecurityFocus columnist Mark Rasch.

At a recent computer security conference in Las Vegas, I was struck by the fact that every computer security vendor was advertising its product, software, service or consulting services as, "100% Sarbanes Oxley Compliant." It's sort of like the saying of being fat free and having reduced carbs. It got me wondering, does the Sarbanes Oxley law really have anything at all to do with computer security? The quick answer is, not as much as you might suspect, but more than the law did before.

A bit of history

To understand the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, (SOX) you have to understand Enron. After reading Kurt Eichenwald's 742 page tome about the Enron scandal, I cannot claim to understand even what Enron did for a living. However, the Enron accounting scandal that led to SOX was a combination of corporate arrogance, director and officer inattention, CFO greed, pervasive conflict of interest, accountants who were captured by their client, and a failure to heed numerous warning signs, including those of inside whistleblowers like Sherron Watkins. At its core, the Enron debacle involved the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's approval of an aggressive (and likely inappropriate to its uses by Enron) form of accounting by Enron called "mark to market," coupled with a series of CFO-owned limited partnerships which were used to offload significant quantities of Enron debt while at the same time this debt was actually being reassumed by Enron itself.

The surest sign of accounting fraud is financial transactions that bear no true independent economic value (although such things are commonplace in the accounting world - think sale and leasebacks, offshore corporations and subsidiaries, etc.) Enron's accounting firm, Arthur Andersen, was beholden to its client for significant fees not only from accounting but from consulting services as well, creating additional conflicts of interest. Complaints of whistleblowers were dismissed by senior Enron management, because they felt as if they were, in the words of movie director Alex Gibney, "The Smartest Guys in the Room".

When SEC and DOJ investigations ensued, Andersen's counsel reminded everyone about the Andersen rule on not retaining accounting workpapers, leading to essentially a shredding party - although the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments during the last week of August on whether or not this activity was even criminal.

After Enron, Congress faced a series of other companies that have either been indicted for fraud or have had to significantly restate earnings because of a failure to accurately capture income and expenses. These include HeathSouth, Adelphia, Tyco, WorldCom, Qwest Communications, and Global Crossing. In each of these cases, it is alleged that senior management participated in events which led to the misstatement of earnings and the deception of investors. Indeed, each of these cases reflect equally corporate officials stealing from the company as well as stealing for the company.

What is important to note about each of these major financial frauds - the ones that essentially led Congress to act - is that none of them involved breakdowns in computer security. Indeed, had there been significant improvements on computer security and access control at each of these companies, there likely would have been no change in the result.

Congress gets involved

Otto Von Bismark once said that those who like sausage and have respect for the law should not watch either being made. The same could be said about the United States Congress. The Sarbanes Oxley Act imposes significant accounting and control requirements on U.S. publicly owned companies (and probably on foreign companies which are either traded on U.S. exchanges or which make up a significant part of a U.S. company's financial reporting). Thus, the new law, which was signed on July 30, 2002, directly addresses the Enron scandal by, for example: establishing records retention requirements for audit papers, creating a new oversight board for accounting firms auditing publicly traded companies (PCAOB), mandating auditor independence, mandating corporate responsibility and accountability at publicly traded companies, reducing conflicts of interests of financial analysts, providing protections for "whistleblowers," and imposing new criminal penalties relating to fraud, conspiracy, and interfering with investigations. You would be hard pressed in reading the text of SOX, its legislative history, or any of the voluminous testimony surrounding it, to find the words "computer security" or "computer crime."

There are several provisions of SOX which do, however, impact IT auditors and security professionals - even if only tangentially. For example, Section 302 requires the CEO and CFO to certify that the financial reports are true and accurate, and that there are in existence adequate controls over financial reporting and disclosure. Section 404 describes these controls, and requires that certification be both reasonable and that the outside auditors also certify the existence of such adequate controls over financial reporting. SOX Section 409 requires publicly traded companies to promptly report any changes in financial condition or reporting that might be material to investors, and Section 802 mandates that companies and their auditors maintain accounting documents and work papers for a minimum of seven years. Nary a mention of IT security. Indeed, SOX seems wholly focused on the accuracy of a company's financial records and controls around these records - income, expenses, accounting, liabilities, etc. Where does IT security come into the picture?

When the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, created as a result of SOX, got to work it established auditing standards, including Standard 2, titled "An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with An Audit of Financial Statements". This document recognized that senior management can't just certify controls ON the system, these controls also have to control the way financial information is generated, accessed, collected, stored, processed, transmitted, and used through the system.

COBIT, COSO, ITIL and OATBNL (And other acronyms to be named later)

Because of SOX's reliance on controls, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (headed by former SEC member James Treadway) developed a series of controls for financial processes which are now known as the COSO guidelines. COSO was originally formed in 1985 to sponsor the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. For IT auditors, the relevant guidelines are COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies) which is an open standard published by the IT Governance Institute and the Information Systems Audit and Control Association. (In the UK, there is the IT Infrastructure Library, published by the Office of Government Commerce in Great Britain which compliments COBIT.) These are a series of IT controls which should be in place in order to make such a SOX certification with respect to IT.

But here is the fundamental question - has there ever been a pervasive and material financial fraud which has resulted directly or indirectly from a failure of an IT security control? Would IT controls have prevented or detected the frauds at Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, and the like?

The answer to the former question is probably yes. If we look back historically to things like the Bearings Bank/Nick Leeson fraud of the late 1980s, or the Allied Irish Bank/Allfirst fraud of the beginning of this millennium - cases in which trusted employees generated and concealed tremendous losses for the company - IT security controls may have been able to prevent or detect such frauds, which certainly would have been material to investors. While such fraud perpetrated by insiders are difficult to detect because such insiders frequently have intimate knowledge of the controls themselves, processes that provide for things like access control, detection of unusual account or access activity, checks and balances for records relating to financial reporting may provide early warning for such fraudulent activity. At best you can make such systems fraud resistant -- not foolproof. Indeed, in many cases those committing significant frauds against a company must obtain unauthorized or superuser access to IT systems in order to either perpetuate the frauds or conceal them. IT security controls can also help companies certify compliance with other legal and regulatory requirements - a SOX mandate.

But for frauds like the next Enron and their ilk, IT security - even under COBIT guidelines - would likely provide no remedy. Where key decisions about how to account for profits, losses and liabilities are created by senior management and approved by independent accountants, all that the IT staff does is streamline the process for ensuring that these decisions are effectuated - not preventing fraudulent or erroneous assumptions.

Contingent liabilities

One underemphasized provision of SOX is the requirement that companies disclose to investors both material events and contingent liabilities that might impact the bottom line. In this regard, IT security becomes more relevant. If you had a choice between investing in a financial institution (or a nuclear power plant) that had sound IT security practices, or one that had none, clearly you would find the IT security decisions to be important. Similarly, a significant attack on an infrastructure could yield losses to confidentiality, reliability or integrity of systems or data that would have to be disclosed to investors (just ask ChoicePoint about that).

The thing to remember about SOX is that it is primarily focused on the accuracy of financial reporting data. IT security is important under SOX only to the extent that it enhances the reliability and integrity of that reporting. To the extent that SOX provides an incentive to companies to do that which they reasonably should be doing anyway, by all means feel free to use it to convince with senior management. The better reason to have good controls over IT and IT security, however, is not because it will make you SOX compliant - but because it will make your business more efficient, enable you to better utilize your data, and allow you to trust ALL the data, not just financial reporting data. If it takes a few senior executives going to jail to achieve that, so be it.

Now ask yourself: are your security vendor's products "100% Sarbanes Oxley Compliant?" You can bet they probably are. And remember, their solutions meeting SOX compliance are also 100% cholesterol free!

Copyright © 2005, SecurityFocus

Mark D. Rasch, J.D., is a former head of the Justice Department's computer crime unit, and now serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Security Counsel at Solutionary Inc.

© Copyright 2005 The Register

Thailand to require registration of cellulart customers

By Nick Cumming-Bruce International Herald Tribune

MONDAY, MAY 2, 2005

BANGKOK For years, Thai authorities acted as if international terrorism was someone else's problem, even after bomb attacks in Bali, Jakarta and Manila brutally exposed the threat to the region. Suddenly, the government has changed tack, and mobile phone operators find themselves caught in its new enthusiasm for security.

>From May 10, the government wants Thailand's four mobile phone operators to start registering the identity of people buying prepaid SIM cards, the so-called subscriber identity module that identifies a phone to its network. That means collecting data on close to one million people a month.

The impetus for this initiative apparently came from a series of bomb blasts in Thailand's mainly Muslim southern provinces, where security forces face an insurgency. The bombs were mostly detonated by cellphones, Thai authorities say.

Every time a bomb goes off, the government closes down local cellular networks in case the bombers have planted a second device designed to hit security forces or rescue services rushing to the scene of the first.

Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who built a family-run telecommunications empire, which includes the biggest of Thailand's cellphone operators, says he is confident that registering SIM card holders will solve the problem of bombers using mobile phones.

But the registration idea makes some people who are not crooks or wannabe terrorist bombers unhappy.

Thailand is not the first country to register prepaid customers. Switzerland introduced registration last year after it found that Al Qaeda had members used prepaid Swiss cards to make calls from Pakistan and Afghanistan. Swisscom, the country's leading phone company, was uneasy about the extra work, although it only had to contend with about 1.9 million prepaid subscribers.

In Thailand, where the authorities eventually want all prepaid sub- scribers registered, the number now totals 21.5 million people and is growing at a rate of about 20 percent a year.

The phone companies say they are supportive of the initiative in principle but see a host of potential problems. It is not clear how much data the government wants them to capture or what requirements customers must fulfill.

There are potential legal snags as operators also have legal obligations not to disclose customer information. And there appear to be different views in government about who should hold and maintain the customer data provided.

Nor is it clear what the government wants to do about foreign cellphones roaming around Thailand - whose fees provide a high-margin source of revenue for Thai operators. One report suggests that visitors would have access to roaming only after registering, an inconvenience for business visitors and the more than 10 million tourists visiting Thailand every year.

"I told them if they are going to be tough about that they could scare away tourists and business people because everyone will think we have a war on," said Athuek Asvanund, vice president and group general counsel for True, which operates a mobile phone service under the TA Orange brand.

There are some potential benefits to the operators, telecommunications analysts point out. Companies will get more client data with which to refine their marketing strategies.

Some security experts doubt the move will be helpful. Registration will not stop bombers from using stolen SIM cards or mobile phones or phones from other countries to detonate bombs or from using false identities to buy them. Moreover, although mobile phones are among the more efficient devices for detonating bombs, courtesy of their digital technology and the quality of the network, there are plenty of other handy gadgets that will do the job, including remote garage door openers and family walkie-talkie sets - anything with a wireless signal.

"What they are doing is spending a lot of time and effort doing something that ultimately may be neither useful or effective," said John Wideman, Thailand country manager for the security consultancy ArmorGroup Asia Pacific. "There are just too many ways around it."

Thursday, May 05, 2005

Offshore bank accounts in China

United Commercial finds a market in overseas financing Yu Ning, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, May 4, 2005

Richard Lee was running into problems finding a partner that would loan him the money his fast-growing company needed to expand its manufacturing operations in China.

The CEO and president of Amsino International Inc. in Pomona (Los Angeles County)didn't have much luck convincing large U.S. banks. He said they were reluctant to get involved in overseas ventures because they were worried about the problems they might run into if the business soured.

That's when he turned to the holding company for United Commercial Bank for help. After a careful review of his proposal, which included a personal visit by the San Francisco bank's CEO to the plant in Shanghai, the bank extended Amsino International the money it needed.

Half of the $10 million loan went to finance the expansion of the plant, which produces medical devices, while the remainder went to cover financing of the purchase of supplies and sale of products to customers in Asia and Europe.

The deal represents an important niche business that United Commercial Bank Holdings has been cultivating as trade relations between China and the United States grow. Over the years, it has been best known as a small community bank that caters to Chinese American customers in the Bay Area, Southern California and New York, providing residential real estate and commercial loans.

Thomas Wu, the bank's chairman, president and CEO, said in an interview that the bank wants to hitch its growth prospects to China's booming economy.

Wu isn't alone. Many other foreign banks are expanding rapidly in China to provide the capital its fast-growing economy needs. According to the China Banking Regulatory Commission, 62 foreign banks from 19 countries had established operations in the country by the end of October.

Unlike banking giants such as Citigroup Inc. and HSBC Holdings Plc that are going after the retail banking business, Wu's bank is focused on making trade-financing loans to small and midsize companies.

According to Wu, the bank's bullish projections show that its commercial business loans and trade-financing business could grow rapidly, accounting for about 20 percent of its loan portfolio in five years and helping the bank reach $15 billion in assets.

Wu said his bank is moving in this direction to respond to the needs of his Chinese American business customers in the United States. "We don't even have to go and knock on the door,'' he said. "We just focus on our existing customer base, and they can refer us to their counterparts in China. The need is huge. We can finance on both sides" of the Pacific.

The only thing holding back the bank is its size. With only $6.3 billion in assets, it is too small to qualify to open branches in China. Foreign banks are required to have at least $20 billion in assets before they can open branches.

What small banks like United Commercial are doing in the interim is to open representative offices in China. That's the first step a foreign bank has to take before Chinese authorities allow them to open branches, where they are able to take deposits and issue loans. The bank has representative offices in Shenzhen and plans to open one in Shanghai later this year. It also has an office in Taipei, Taiwan.

The representative offices allow the bank to establish local business ties and analyze the economic climate. They also can route any potential business to United Commercial's Hong Kong branch, which opened in November 2003 after it was granted a full banking license by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.

Tony Tsui, general manager of the Hong Kong branch, said business has been brisk since it opened. It has taken in $410 million in deposits and secured $206 million in loan commitments.

Catering to small to midsize businesses, the branch takes three to four weeks to underwrite a trade-finance loan. The loans range from $500,000 to $20 million, with the average loan $2 million to $3 million. Tsui said it will take the branch about two to three years to break even.

United Commercial is closer to converting the office in Taipei into its second branch than it is to establishing one in China. That's because the asset requirements for opening a branch are different in Taiwan. There, a representative office can be upgraded to a branch if the foreign bank's assets rank among the top 500 banks in the world. According to the last count, Wu said, his bank ranks just above 600th.

Wu said he has talked with officials of the China Banking Regulatory Commission about the opportunities to convert more representative offices to branches and was given a couple of options to increase the bank's assets by investing or acquiring local banks.

Wu acknowledges that the competition from other banks is very strong, but very few of them understand what is required to do business in different markets as well as United Commercial, he said. He also believes the bank's size allows it to establish a closer relationship with his customers.

Lee, the CEO of Amsino International, matches the bank's profile of a growing number of Chinese American businessmen who have turned to China for manufacturing.

Lee's firm has relied on the joint-venture company he established in Shanghai and Jiangsu province more than a decade ago to produce more than 90 percent of his products at a cost savings of 20 to 30 percent.

The outsourcing has helped Lee's company to grow by 50 percent annually for the past four years. That growth, in turn, has led Lee to seek financing every six months. "I need a financial partner to support us and grow with us, '' he said.

Wu, who went to China to visit the plant, said he felt comfortable about the loan to Lee because the bank had extended a $10 million line of credit to the company two years ago and because he liked the company's business plan and growth potential.

Lana Chan, an analyst with Harris Nesbitt Corp., said United Commercial's long-range projections to increase trade-financing loans to 20 percent of its loan portfolio seems a bit aggressive. But she noted that the bank's aggressive and early expansion into Hong Kong and China will give it an advantage over its competitors. Neither Chan nor her firm own shares in the bank. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

United Commercial Bank Holdings Headquarters: San Francisco Chairman, president and CEO: Thomas Wu Assets: $6.3 billion

East Asia strategy: To boost its deposits and commercial loan business by establishing branches in China. It has a branch in Hong Kong and representative offices in Shenzhen and Taipei. It plans to open another representative office in Shanghai later this year.

E-mail Yu Ning at nyu@sfchronicle.com.

Page C - 1

©2005 San Francisco Chronicle

Offshore bank in trouble - Arab Bank

By Joel Mowbray

When a House Financial Services panel today takes up the issue of Islamic charities and terror financing, what won't be seen is far more interesting - and important - than what will. The story of how what had promised to be an explosive session was gutted is a tale of international lobbying, partisan protection and misplaced animosity. And of course, it wouldn't be genuine intrigue without loads of Saudi cash.

Rep. Sue Kelly, New York Republican, chairwoman of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee, had originally scheduled a hearing for last month that was to include administration officials, experts who were prepared to provide evidence of financing for specific terror attacks, and - to make the human toll tangible - victims and families of victims of terror.

Though there have been dozens of hearings on the general topic of terror financing, this one was special: The sole focus was to be the suddenly embattled Arab Bank. The bank earlier this year suffered the partial closure of its New York branch - it can no longer establish new accounts there or accept deposits - after the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency reportedly found gross violations of money-laundering and terror-finance regulations.

Today's emasculated hearing is the first bit of good news the bank has received in nearly a year. When trial attorney Gary Osen - a free-market conservative who has a penchant for tackling larger-than-life cases - discovered evidence last year suggesting that Arab Bank was knowingly funneling money to Palestinian terrorists, he filed a civil suit on behalf of terror victims last July. (Famed trial lawyer Ron Motley of asbestos and tobacco lore has since filed a parallel suit.)

Spurred on at least in part by the victims' lawsuit, the OCC and the Office of Foreign Assets Control conducted investigations into Arab Bank, which has $32 billion in assets and was founded in 1930. Published accounts indicate that the OCC report is damning. Arab Bank is waiting for the other shoe to drop as OFAC, which by design has a more targeted focus on fighting terror financing, could issue an even more scorching report.

Why the feds have waited until this year to act is a question that Congress should have been exploring today - if only Arab Bank were still the focus of the hearing. Mr. Osen learned of Arab Bank's alleged terror financing not through a well-placed source or covert whistleblower, but on the Internet.

Documents captured by the Israeli Defense Forces during targeted raids of terror outfits yielded a massive cache of evidence tying Arab Bank to funding of Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and families of suicide bombers - and the IDF posted much of it on the net. Though Arab Bank denies it was ever knowingly involved in terror financing, the public record appears to contradict such assertions. Various jihadist Web sites openly raising funds informed prospective donors to direct contributions to numbered accounts at Arab Bank.

But even more openly than that, advertisements in prominent Palestinian newspapers told families of "martyrs" - suicide bombers - to collect money from Arab Bank. One February 2002 ad listed names entitled to receive $5,316.06 from the "Saudi Committee." The "Saudi Committee" referenced is likely at least part of the reason that the feds are hustling to shield Arab Bank, despite the wealth of evidence that led to the partial shuttering of the institution's New York branch.

The Saudi Committee for the Support of the Intifada al Quds, which was established shortly after the start of the current intifada, attained international notoriety when its 2002 telethon netted over $100 million. Part of its ability to raise such funds was its open embrace of "martyrdom." The Saudi Committee's stated purpose is to fund "all suffering families - the families of the martyrs and the injured Palestinians and the disabled."

Aside from ostensible Saudi pressure, both Jordan and the Palestinian Authority have been lobbying the U.S. government to go easy on Arab Bank. The largest private bank in both economies, Arab Bank faces little risk that the United States would allow it to become insolvent outright. But given its $32 billion in assets, it would likely take more than a handful of lawsuits to sink Arab Bank.

Regardless, State and Treasury Department officials did not want to appear at a hearing featuring terror victims - and then they also insisted that Arab Bank no longer be the hearing's focus. Apparently believing it should side with the Republican administration over trial lawyers, the Republican Congress played along. Mrs. Kelly will be allowed to hold another hearing featuring terror victims, but the powerful combination of evidence tied to its devastating consequences will be lost.

If Arab Bank and its influential allies have their way, the public will never learn most of the contents of the OCC and OFAC reports. For those hoping Congress might fulfill its duty to inform the public, the tale of today's hearing is anything but encouraging.

Joel Mowbray occasionally writes for The Washington Times.

All site contents copyright © 2005 News World Communications, Inc

Offshore asset protection trusts as tax shelters

An offshore trust as a tax shelter for UK domiciliaries...

With tax anti-avoidance legislation being potentially all encompassing for UK domicilaries how is it possible to use an offshore trust as an effective tool for the sheltering of assets and income from taxation?

There are actually only 3 main ways for a UK domiciled settlor to benefit...that said, it is most certainly worth speaking to a financial or taxation adviser with an international offshore focus to determine whether or not a trust or something like a portfolio bond could be of benefit for you.

The 3 main ways for a UK domiciled settlor to benefit from the establishment of a trust for tax sheltering purposes are: -

1) If the settlor has died an offshore trust can be used as a tax shelter

2) If no ‘defined person’ is a beneficiary then the establishment of a trust offshore can be used for taxation avoidance purposes

3) If a child is the beneficiary of the offshore settlement again the use of a trust can prove tax efficient

1) If the settlor has died - a trust which is created by testamentary disposition (i.e., through a settlor’s will) will only be formed once the settlor has died, therefore as the settlor is dead then no income or capital gains taxes can be levied against him. The assets being disposed of into the trust are of course potentially subject to IHT however...unless they fall within the nil rate band or are IHT exempt.

2) If no ‘defined person’ is a beneficiary - the term ‘defined person’ covers most close family members and so this exception is quite rare, however trusts can be set up by distant relatives or friends of the beneficiaries. These trusts would still operate as a shelter for both income and capital gains.

3) If a child is the beneficiary of the offshore settlement - if a settlor places assets into a trust from which children or grandchildren benefit from foreign income (though not foreign gains) then this is still a fairly tax effective way of using a trust, though care has to be taken not to trigger taxation anti-avoidance legislation.

Offshore trusts and overseas taxes

Depending on the taxation rules of the overseas country the settlor is resident and/or domiciled in, an offshore trust can minimise the overseas taxes as well.

In this instance a settlor can use a trust effectively to avoid or reduce inheritance tax.

Choosing a safe tax haven for your cash

By Carolyn Batt

Luxembourg, Jersey or The Bahamas? The Isle of Man, Cyprus or Bermuda? It's a question many expats face frequently, and it's not about where to take their next holiday.

In the financial sense, "offshore" means a jurisdiction other than the one where you reside. But it is important that investors in offshore funds consider both where the fund is domiciled, and whether there is a satisfactory investor protection regime in place, before parting with their savings.

"The general lack of trust in the financial services industry is greater now than it has been at any time in the industry's history. People who want extra comfort should pay attention to aspects like domicile," said Jonathan Fry, the principal of Yorkshire-based independent financial advisers Jonathan Fry & Co, who names Luxembourg as his preferred fund domicile because its investor protection rules are "second to none".

"We would never buy a house without checking the location," explains Mr Fry. "But how often do people buy investments without considering the correct holding structure for the investment, or comparing available jurisdictions? People working overseas, who are starting to invest offshore, need to be very careful where they put their money."

The domicile of a fund is the place where the institution behind the fund is administered and regulated. There are dozens to choose from, although IFAs tend to be wary of the more exotic locations. "I've never really considered the more esoteric domiciles, as there are more than enough funds to choose from in the better-known locations," said Vivienne Starkey, director of IFA Equal Partners. "For most investors, security is the most important thing, and for that I recommend places like the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands and Dublin. I would tend not to go for places like Bermuda and the Cayman Islands."

A good IFA should tell you whether a particular offshore domicile has stringent investor protection legislation or other measures in place. "Another aspect is anonymity," Ms Starkey added. "Countries like Switzerland, or particularly Luxembourg in the offshore investment field, don't share banking information with other people, and some investors like that.

"Another issue is the political circumstances. You don't want to invest in countries that may have unfavourable political regimes. Never forget, it's your money."

James McBrearty, a director and offshore expert at John Scott & Partners, says domicile can be important for a number of other reasons, including the ease of communication, transparency of charges, and the knowledge of the fund managers. "My preference on domicile of fund manager would be one of the major offshore financial centres such as Luxembourg, Dublin, Channel Islands, Isle of Man or possibly Switzerland for these reasons," he said.

Another benefit, he added, was the ability to obtain information on aspects commonly considered by advisers in the UK, such as asset allocation and risk factors. "People should get tax advice to check that offshore funds offer an advantage in the place they live," Ms Starkey added.

"There is a misconception among Britons, both in Britain and abroad, that offshore investment will always be tax-free.

"It's not true, and it's very important that they obtain tax advice both before moving to a foreign country, and again before moving back to the UK."

© Copyright of Telegraph Group Limited 2005.

Offshore bank accounts, money laundering and cybercrime

Source: Computer Crime Research Center By: CCRC staff

The emergence of electronic money and global systems of electronic payments formed a parallel banking system. It has the entire network of semi-legal financial institutions. The unique opportunities of quickly shaped infrastructure drew attention of criminal groups at once. It allowed anyone to rapidly transfer monetary funds to any country, anonymously, through tangled routes. Heretofore, electronic transfers interested criminals as the efficient tool to conceal sources of money intakes, to launder illegally earned money and to conceal their incomes to evade taxes.

Here's one of the criminal schemes of payment operations. There operations can be hardly tracked by law enforcement: upon receipt of merchandise, let's say drugs, the buyer electronically transfers money to the credit card of the supplier. The last at one stroke transfers this money through the system of electronic payments to his bank account in the country with strong bank secrecy laws. Then the supplier can simply transfer his money to the card account in parts and can easily use these money.

In Russia, one of the registered forms of computer crimes purposing to evade taxes is the use of computers to interfere with pool memory of electronic cashier registers installed at shops. As a result of such interference, the registry of payments is modified or deleted. It allows to hide real incomes from tax administrations.

Copyright © 2001-2005 Computer Crime Research Center

Precautionary steps prevent money laundering, says CBO

MUSCAT, Oman - Hamood bin Sangour Al Zadjali, executive president of the Central Bank of Oman (CBO), said the Sultanate is free of money laundering operations thanks to the precautionary measures, laws and systems adopted by banks, financial and banking companies operating in the country.

He added, in a statement he delivered yesterday after opening a seminar, titled 'Correspondence banks, a gateway to money laundering,' that employees of such institutions have to be reminded from time to time with the risks resulting from money laundering on the Omani banking system.

He noted that the CBO applies the 40 criteria of the Basil Committee and eight criteria on financing terrorism which were issued by the United Nations.

He noted that all pertinent institutions in the Sultanate including the CBO accord special attention to encountering any attempts for money laundering and terrorism financing. He added the practical steps undertaken in this regard include raising awareness and increasing information exchange on developments in order to enhance the Sultanate's plans to combat money laundering and terrorism financing. He said the holding of this seminar comes within the context of these efforts.

Lectures delivered during the seminar focused on the threats of money laundering on banking and financial institutions and how to avoid it. The lecturers said as the Gulf region and the Middle East is a centre for various money transfer operations, its financial and banking institutions have to enhance monitoring in order to avoid money laundering and terrorism financing operations. - ONA

German capitalism bashing may undermine Schroeder

May 3 (Bloomberg) -- Criticism within Germany's ruling Social Democratic Party of free-market practices may undermine Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's resolve to make the economy more competitive, said economists including Juergen Michels at Citigroup Global Markets in London.

Party chairman Franz Muentefering last month compared investors seeking short-term gains to the biblical plague of locusts that descended on Egypt, stripping it of vegetation. The Handelsblatt newspaper cited Finance Minister Hans Eichel as saying in an interview to be published tomorrow as criticizing companies that ``systematically give the impression they have to cut jobs to improve their share price.''

The criticism has made it ``more difficult for the government to push ahead with further reforms'' that might attract investment and lower unemployment, said Michels in an interview. ``There are already signs that the reform process isn't only braking, but rather going into reverse.''

Since Schroeder's second term in office began in 2002, the chancellor has enacted the first ever benefit cuts for the long- term unemployed, reduced protection from dismissal at small companies and forced those without work to accept any kind of job or lose benefits. That hasn't stopped the jobless rate from rising to a post-World War II record and has eroded support for the Social Democrats ahead of regional elections this month.

``It is rather shabby to create the impression that evil financial investors are to blame for the economic situation rather than the structural problems that still persist,'' Michels said. ``It conceals the true problems, such as an inflexible labor market, cumbersome tax laws and high labor costs.''

Corporate Tax

Germany's unemployment rate rose for 14 months to a postwar record of 12 percent in March before falling in April. At 38 percent, the average corporate-tax rate, including local taxes, is twice that in neighboring countries such as Slovakia and at 49,609 euros ($63,777) per worker, German annual employment costs are the highest in the EU, according to Deloitte & Touche LLP.

Schroeder's government plans to lower the corporate-tax rate by 6 percentage points, though it's yet to agree with the opposition, which controls the upper house of parliament, on funding.

Before the May 22 elections in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany's most populous state, the Social Democrats and their Green party coalition partners are trailing the opposition Christian Democratic Union and its ally, the Free Democratic Party, by 10 percentage points, a poll by opinion researcher Forsa showed today. The Social Democrats have ruled the state for 39 years.

Election Defeat?

``With outspoken anti-capitalist sentiment within his government coalition, Mr. Schroeder could find it difficult to return to a pro-reform course,'' Thorsten Polleit, chief economist for Germany at Barclays Capital in Frankfurt, said today in a note to investors. ``An election defeat in NRW could even question Mr. Schroeder's leading role in the forthcoming federal election in autumn 2006.''

Germans are ``skeptical, even dismissive of `capitalism', and still believe in the `social-market' model,'' Polleit said. Politicians from other parties, including Wolfgang Boehmer, the Christian Democrat prime minister of the eastern state of Saxony- Anhalt, have backed Muentefering's criticism.

Stern magazine reported last week that an internal Social Democratic Party document names the Carlyle Group, Apax Partners and Saban Capital Group on a list of private-equity funds causing harm to the German economy.

`Excesses'

Handelsblatt cited Eichel as saying that ``unregulated offshore centers where half of all hedge funds are based'' are ``excesses'' of capitalism.

Guenter Grass, the 1999 Nobel prize winner for literature, called on his fellow citizens to ``resist the might of capital, for which humans are only entities that produce and consume,'' the weekly newspaper Die Zeit reported today. Parliament has become ``a branch of the stock exchange,'' he said.

The head of Germany's BDA employers' association, Dieter Hundt, said on ZDF television April 28 that he was ``disappointed'' and ``angered'' by the criticism. ``What's happening in this country at the moment makes me want to vomit,'' he said.

``The latest anti-capitalism critique might prove to be more than just a pre-election rhetoric with effects confined to Germany,'' Polleit said. ``It runs the risk of introducing a phase of a serious disenchantment with an actively sought reform process, in Germany as well as in Europe.''

Progress at ``structural reform'' has also been slow in the dozen-nation euro region, the International Monetary Fund said at its spring meeting in Washington last month. The IMF pared its forecast for the euro region to 1.6 percent, from a September estimate of 2.2 percent.

To contact the reporter on this story: Rainer Buergin in Berlin at rbuergin1@bloomberg.net. Last Updated: May 3, 2005 10:19 EDT

©2005 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved.

Offshore traders in the raw

Ready access to cheap bank credit will lead to another commodity crisis in China, warn Hong Kong financiers.

Global commodity prices are at 10-15 year highs and the market tipping the scales on demand is China. China's appetite for steel, petroleum and downstream petroleum products has doubled in two years. The country has become the world's largest consumer of copper, aluminum and cement, and last year overtook Japan as the world's second largest importer of oil. It is also the number one buyer of soybeans.

The Chinese government is aware of the need for raw materials to fuel its economic growth and is passing new rules to facilitate more trade. In January last year the number of categories of import commodities subject to licensing controls was reduced from eight down to five.

Financing this trade is inherently more risky than traditional trade finance of manufactured goods. There is volatility in the underlying spot price of the materials, production is subject to cyclical and seasonal swings, some materials (like foodstuffs) are perishable, and the trades are much larger in overall size. The other risk is bad behaviour by opportunistic middlemen. "There has been a tendency for some small Asian trading companies to dodge off their obligations," says one Hong Kong banker. "They like to make a profit on the growth in demand for certain commodities but when prices go against them they sprint for the woods."

China is no stranger to commodity crises. In June last year 90%, of Brazil's soybean exports to China were blocked following accusations that the shipments were contaminated. Media speculated that China was reneging on contracts in order to bring down the world price in soybeans. Eventually the ban was lifted and trade resumed, but only after several commodity trading companies renegotiated the price of their shipments - dropping their prices by as much as 20% in some cases. The incident also left underwriting banks waiting nervously until outstanding letters of credit had been settled.

Before the soybean crisis there was a steel crisis and a copper crisis. One of the common characteristics of these crises is the involvement of smaller trading companies. Opportunists that speculate on a commodity regardless of their expertise in the product. These speculators squeeze the margins made by the trading community, flood the market with the product, push up the global price of the commodity and cause a collapse.

The fever currently surrounding commodity trade with China has some people worried that the mistakes made in Russia might be repeated in Asia. In the mid to late 1990s Russia was where China is today, an emerging market with a large population to feed and supply electricity to, and billions of dollars of infrastructure projects under construction. Trading companies of all shapes and sizes began speculating on commodities, particularly oil. Banks were offering five-year financing at 3% over Libor. When the supply/demand balance tipped, banks and traders were hit.

The activities of smaller unscrupulous trading outfits are a frustration to larger more sophisticated international commodity traders such as Noble, Cargill and ADM. Today, these traders are very active in China. They play both sides of the game, selling to end users around the world but also controlling the supply by signing off-take agreements with producers in China and guaranteeing the purchase of a product for a certain period of time. This has been an effective way for producers to finance their expansion. The large trading companies also act as suppliers to processing plants, importing raw materials to mills and refineries and then purchasing the output for export.

The presence of these large traders, and China's growing demand for commodities, has brought a lot of interest from banks. Specialist banks like Rabobank, Fortis and BNP Paribas have been financing commodities in the region for many years. And now the big global banks are reshuffling their desks to take advantage of the trade. HSBC has set up a global commodities business in London under Jean-Francois Lambert and in April will appoint a regional manager for Asia. Meanwhile, Citigroup hired Willem Klaassens from Fortis in London and moved him to Hong Kong where he is building a dedicated team. Other banks are dipping their toes in the water via their structured trade finance divisions. "Like many others, we are responding to the increased volumes in commodity trade in Asia," says Alistair Currie, head of trade services for HSBC in Asia Pacific. "We already provide commodity financing for clients, but are now stepping this activity up within a standalone structured trade finance unit covering the region. Client demand justifies the separate focus in addition to our standard trade business."

While the big foreign banks have cut their teeth on financing exports from China, they are now keen to finance imports, and that means taking on more risk. It's a risk that only a few will stomach - those big players with the backing of large balance sheets or the specialist banks that are masters at risk assessment. This ultimately means more finance is being made available to Chinese buyers. "In the past, the receivables had to be offshore before banks were prepared to take the risk," says Klaassens from Citigroup. "Now some banks don't mind getting repaid in China."

At the same time, banks are moving into different commodities. While base metals are less risky to finance because they don't get stolen and don't perish, there are other raw materials that have attractive risk dynamics. "Commodities that are being bought for the long-term economic betterment of the country, rather than for pure price speculation, are generally good bets," says Currie at HSBC. "Oil and foodstuffs are in high demand and all concerned in this trade for direct consumption have an interest in keeping these financing activities viable and scandal free."

The big banks are doing what they can to keep their powder dry. Assessing the risks of a commodity trade involves more than just conducting credit analysis on the trading company and the buyer. The credit department needs to look at the risks of the underlying commodity and the logistics of delivery. Banks are following different risk mitigation strategies from sticking with a core group of large trusted clients to financing certain commodities. "We only deal with buyers who have a significant relationship with our key MNC customers and we tend to stick to commodities listed in the London Metal Exchange like gold and copper," says Astar Saleh, regional head of structured trade for JPMorgan, explaining the bank's strategy. "We don't offer pure inventory financing in Asia unless we partner with a local bank."

Risks can also be mitigated by dotting Is and crossing Ts, says Currie at HSBC. "If you meticulously manage your operations, ensuring that the trade is supported by the right documentation and other key aspects like legal, insurance and compliance have been properly covered, then you can usually avoid trouble, but not always."

Following strict risk guidelines becomes harder when the competition for commodity business is so hot and margins are being squeezed. While the big banks make it a policy of following procedures regardless of market sentiment, the fever pitch is a concern, says Klaassens at Citigroup, who lays some of the blame for commodity crises, like the 2004 soybean mess, on banks. "As a banking community we should stick to our pricing and stick to our standards," he says. "If finance is too easily available to disreputable companies and at a cheap price then more people get hurt when a crisis hits."

Nobody is prepared to say whether a commodity finance crisis truly is looming in China and what impact a bust would have on the rest of the world. Back in the late-1990s Russia was able to export its way out of the crisis, an option not open to China now that it is so reliant on imports. "These sort of calamities can take 10 years to turn around," says one banker. "The big banks may not lose money because they stick to their pricing regimes and their risk controls, but it isn't much fun trying to do business in a commodities market that booms and busts."


© Copyright FinanceAsia.com Ltd

Offshore bank accounts to get some share of $10 trillion in inheritance transfers

Business New Haven 05/02/2005

Can't Take It with You As the largest wealth transfer in history looms, federal and state inheritance laws struggle to adapt

Melissa Nicefaro

America is on the cusp of the largest transfer of wealth in history.

Over the next decade, baby-boomers will inherit somewhere around $10 trillion. The exact amount is unknown, but unquestionably vast. In the early 1990s Cornell University economists reported that baby-boomers' parents would pass along more than $10 trillion to their heirs. By the late 1990s Boston College professors had calculated that the sum was actually closer to $100 trillion.

Eric Tashlein, managing member and principal of Connecticut Capital Management Group in Milford and president of the Financial Planning Association of New Haven, is already beginning to see signs of the great passage.

"There is $10 trillion that, in the next years, is expected to be inherited by the baby-boomers," says Tashlein. "We're starting to see that now. Some of that translates into new cars and other folks see themselves as stewards for the money and don't go out and spend it all.

"I see a combination of both, but I'm seeing a lot of inheritance," he adds. "Baby-boomers love to spend money, so it'll be interesting to see what happens when it comes over."

The sudden appearance of large sums of money, very much like hitting the lottery, can pose a challenge for the person on the receiving end. If the estate's value exceeds $1.5 million, there is a federal inheritance tax and a small tax to the state of Connecticut.

"The challenge all depends on if their parents did proper planning," Tashlein says. "Hopefully the family communicates. It's always a great idea to have a family meeting with advisors there with the parents and children. The parents' hopeful expectations for how the money should be used will be spelled out. In the real world, this doesn't always happen."

It may not be an easy conversation to have with your parents or your children, but wills cover only part of leaving an inheritance. Though wills clearly say who is to be bequeathed what, the will doesn't always convey the wishes of the giver regarding what is to be done with the money or other parts of the estate once it's been transferred.

"We like our clients to have family meetings," says Tashlein. "We've seen many inheritances handled well and others have been squandered. There are psychological issues with sudden money, and I would suggest to everyone have goals for the money - spend some and save some."

Tashlein says that inheritance money is most frequently spent on cars, homes, vacations and investments.

It is important to many older parents to know that their estate, no matter how large or small, is going to be wisely spent and will see their children living in comfort into their older years.

Edward Renn, a principal with the New Haven tax law firm Withers Bergman, handles the planning that results in the wealth transfer. Often Renn goes on to represent the recipients of inheritance, the younger generation, as they take over the family business and inherit the structure of their parents' or grandparents' estate.

"Most of my clients who are inheriting money from their parents or grandparents are inheriting in a trust and there's not that much going outright to children," Renn explains. "The trust provides creditor protection if the children get divorced, are sued for malpractice or go bankrupt. The money Mom or Dad left in the trust is protected and serves as a vehicle that, with proper planning, if the children don't use it up, they'll be able to pass it to their children without paying estate tax."

Still, there are not many loopholes to avoid taxation, especially when the estate's value exceeds $1.5 million.

"The system is designed so that one way or another, they [the state and federal governments] get their bite," Renn says. "That's why it's a unified system with gifts and estate. If you could just gift it away and avoid the estate tax, everybody would be gifting it away. If you died suddenly, you wouldn't have the opportunity to do it, but otherwise, people would be in the hospital, signing documents and making gifts."

As a general rule, good estate planning is about transferring assets earlier rather than later so that all the appreciation belongs to the children's rather than the parent's generation. As Renn says, "The things we like to see passed to kids are the growth assets, the aggressive stock portfolio, the family business that is growing rapidly, the real estate that's likely to be the next office park. That's better than the two-family rental house or the bond portfolio or the CD. Those are just going to throw back the six or seven percent and that's that."

The vast majority of estates go to surviving spouses, children and grandchildren. Some clients do have charitable intent, Renn says, but few leave their entire estates to charities. In most cases, they'll leave some percentage or fixed dollar amount.

Those with smaller (less than $1.5 million) estates face no federal tax, state estate tax or succession tax unless it's from complete strangers (see accompanying article). The only costs involved here are probate charges. Somebody who passes an estate with a modest house and a small portfolio totaling $500,000, will face a nominal fee - around $1,000.

"Unless they have a very complicated pattern," Renn says, "it doesn't cost a whole lot to move that asset."

Probate in Connecticut is not a very expensive procedure compared to some of Western states where it's calculated as a percentage of the estate. It depends on the type of property and the relationship of the person inheriting to the person doing the giving.

Compared to other states, Connecticut is not a particularly bad state, but it's not a tax haven either, according to Renn.

"In Florida, there's a constitutional provision that prohibits addition of a new tax without amending the [state] constitution. They're stuck with an estate tax that doesn't do what it used to do and they have no income tax. Very often people will have vacation homes in other states like Florida, and if they don't plan properly, they have to go through the probate procedure in two different states. If they go ahead and move that property in the ancillary jurisdiction into a trust, they can avoid probate."

The cost of the trust is often much less than the cost and hassle of probating in another state.

Says Renn: "It's not the cost to the probate courts. It's the filings, the tax returns, being under three different state tax systems. It's not pretty."

Inheritance Laws

They say two things are certain: death and taxes. If so, nothing could be worse than facing those two certainties at once.

The good news is that if you inherit less than $1.5 million, you pay no estate taxes in Connecticut.

In fact, a married couple, as long as both are U.S. citizens, can pass any amount of money to each other without paying estate tax.

"That's called the unlimited marital deduction," explains Edward Renn, a tax attorney with Withers Bergman. "A husband and wife can pass a billion dollars and no taxes will be due. Once you get beyond that, this year it's to $1.5 million, in total to any number of beneficiaries without being hit with federal taxes."

The cap is frequently changing as a plan to eliminate the estate tax exemption works its way toward 2010. For 2004 and 2005 the cap was $1.5 million. In 2006, the exemption ceiling goes up to $2 million. In 2009, any estate under $3.5 million is exempt and by 2010, there will be no more estate tax, unless Congress votes to renew it. When Congress passed the legislation in 2001, estate tax was assessed on any taxable estate of more than $675,000.

"That's called the applicable exclusion amount, or the unified credit," Renn explains. "The taxing system on the federal side is a unified system in that they pay attention to your gifts as well as your inheritance. Of the $1.5 million tax exemption you have from the feds, you can use only $1 million for lifetime gifts. There is an annual exclusion of $11,000 per year which will probably go to $12,000 next year, depending on what inflation does. I suspect it will make it next year."

Connecticut has two "inheritance" taxes: the estate tax and the succession tax. The succession tax affects only people leaving assets to distant relations or unrelated individuals. A longtime couple who is not married, same-sex couples, or an uncle who has no family and leaves money to nieces and nephews will face succession tax.

Charitable Giving

While many (though not all) sons and daughters stand to inherit countless riches in years to come as their wealthy baby-boomer parents begin to pass from the scene, they will be paying less in estate taxes. Though a full repeal of the federal estate tax planned for 2010 is good news to most, one group stands to suffer: charities.

In July 2004, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), at the request of the Senate Finance Committee, examined the effect that changing the estate tax would have on donations to charity. Because charitable bequests lower the taxable amount of estates, the tax gives people an incentive to contribute to charity at death rather than leave assets to heirs. The estate tax is thus an incentive to make charitable contributions during life.

The paper calculated that increasing the amount exempted from the estate tax from $675,000 to either $2 million or $3.5 million would reduce charitable giving by less than three percent. Repealing the tax would have a larger impact, decreasing donations to charity by anywhere from six to 12 percent based on 2000 contribution figures. Adjusting the figure to forecasted 2010 contributions would put the loss closer to 22 percent.

This has Nancy Roberts, president of the Connecticut Council for Philanthropy, understandably concerned.

"The Congressional Budget Office did this study in 2004 to look at what would happen to giving to non-profits without the estate tax and they found that there would be a 22-percent hit to the non-profit sector," Roberts says. "If the estate tax is eliminated, that's 22 percent now going to non-profits that will not be going to them."

In 2002, 2,124 Connecticut residents left their entire estates - totaling nearly $4.6 billion - to charity. Connecticut residents also made 410 charitable bequests totaling more than $383 million in 2002. Connecticut's totals grow about two percent each year, according to Roberts.

Tax havens and money laundering

El Pais Spain | JOAQUIN ESTEFANIA

The first initiative President George W. Bush sought to impose after the September 11 attacks was that of financial vigilance, i.e. the control of money being handled by terrorists. This was easier said than done, given that much of this money is in tax havens, and there is no legislation to control it. With their usual pragmatism, the Americans made some changes. The Patriot Act placed banks under the obligation to report any "suspicious" activity; and the law reforming the secret services, enacted late last year, contained a clause that allows the government discreetly to inspect international bank transactions to detect supposed terrorist activities.

The laundering of "black" money is not just an illicit financial operation; it also stimulates criminal activities and spurs organized crime. The authorities have never really tried to make public opinion aware of its real significance. Right now, in Spain, the police and judiciary are forging ahead with the so-called "Operation White Whale," aimed at searching out the origins of a vast network of "black money," apparently of largely criminal origin, in the southern coastal resorts of the Costa del Sol. This network might appear to be unusual. But in fact these sorts of money laundering operations are an everyday occurrence.

According to data from the Association for Taxation on Transactions in Aid of Citizens (ATTAC), "the most prudent calculations, though difficult to verify in a field where the law of silence reigns, indicate that the global volume of dealings in money proceeding from the illicit activities of different criminal organizations, what may be called the Gross Criminal Product, amounts to no less than E 800 billion annually, equivalent to 15 percent of world trade."

ATTAC estimates that the quantity of money deposited in tax havens amounts to five trillion dollars, some 2.4 million front companies being registered in these places. Loretta Napoleoni, who has studied the economic theory of terrorism, speaks of a $1.5 trillion system, with this huge sum being made up largely of drug trafficking, but also involving oil, arms, precious stones and human beings.

Faced with this, the Spanish government has just implemented a European Union directive from 2001, with the aim of strengthening the coordination between different professional sectors of society (lawyers, notaries, banks, magistrates) in a bid to close all channels for the laundering of criminal capital.

Resolving the clear contradictions between this directive and the daily conduct of civil society (the professional secrecy or confidentiality of lawyers, notaries, etc.) was the stated objective of a well-attended debate held last week at the Madrid College of Notaries.

Here, the members of the Spanish notarial profession considered the absurd paradox involved in imposing more or less strict vigilance on companies registered in the offices of Spanish notaries, while at the same time allowing the operation - to all legal effects and in complete impunity - of some 100,000 implausible companies registered in Gibraltar, the final traces of which are always lost in some banking institution in the tax havens. Or the existence of front companies in Europe (Isles of Man or Jersey, Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino, Malta, Cyprus) and in Delaware in the United States, which do not comply with the security and identification requirements normally demanded in most major states, and which have no controls or operative restrictions.

Some days ago, the ATTAC representative in Spain presented to the secretary of state for the economy, David Vegara, a set of proposals for tighter controls: the standardization of national legislation concerning financial crime via the adoption of preventive measures (registry and follow-up, European public control of financial clearing-houses, prohibition of banks accepting funds from tax havens, or opening off-shore subsidiaries); creation of a European agency dealing with tax fraud; lifting of bank secrecy, with the threat of punishment of non-cooperating states; and compulsory transparency by firms regarding the activities, subsidiaries and capital invested in risk countries.

Should these norms not figure among the basic standards of good corporate governance, which has recently been the focus of so much discussion?

http://www.elpais.es © 2005 El Pais Copyright © 2005 The International News Alliance. All Rights Reserved.

Growth in Kuwait offshore bank accounts

Recent years have witnessed a growth in both the size and sophistication of the region's banking industry. The 45 listed banks across the six GCC countries, which we are covering in this GCC Banking Sector Report, had an aggregate asset size of US$354.3bn at the end of 2004, having grown by 14.8% over 2003. These banks had aggregate net profit of US$8.9bn in 2004, having grown by a healthy 38.6% over 2003.

The major highlights of the region's banking industry are as follows:

i. Low business diversification
The business diversification of the GCC banks remains relatively poor. 'Plain vanilla' credit products and services constitute the bulk of the region's banking activities, with particular focus on short-term loans. Investment activities are almost restricted to government bills and bonds, along with investment-grade securities in mostly international markets. Trading positions are generally limited. Activities such as sophisticated structured financing, advisory, asset and fund management, fiduciary and custody services are at a nascent stage. Top-tier banks are now placing particular emphasis on the development of domestic asset management competencies. Internet banking has reached a high level of use in the GCC, compared with other emerging markets.

ii. Controlling ownership by government and influential families
The shareholding structures of the GCC banks are often dominated by two groups of owners - governments or government agencies, and influential ruling or merchant families. Government ownership enables them to intervene and support their banks during a crisis. On the other hand, shareholdings of leading business families leave banks vulnerable to potential related-party lending and shareholder meddling in credit policies.

iii. Constrained by relatively small size
While the balance sheet sizes of most banks in the region have grown in recent years, reflecting their business growth, they are still small compared to their Western counterparts. The foreign assets as a proportion of total assets have generally trended down for the GCC as a whole though Kuwait, Oman and Qatar are exceptions to this general trend. Legal barriers to entry and family ownership are certainly the main causes of the very slow emergence of a regional playing field.

iv. High concentration
Banking businesses in the six GCC countries are concentrated locally. The single notable exception to this trend has been the asset concentration profile of banks in Bahrain, thanks to the many Offshore Banking Units (OBUs) operating from that country. The aggregate foreign assets of banks in the six GCC countries, while growing at a CAGR of 4.9% during 2001-'04, have generally trended down as a proportion of the total assets of the banks during the period, indicating a larger concentration of their business in their respective geographies. The most price-competitive market is undoubtedly that of the UAE, which is overbanked, with 47 financial institutions serving a population of about 4.3 million inhabitants.

v. High capitalization
As far as capitalization is concerned, the GCC banks usually keep high capital bases as a cushion to absorb unexpected losses. The median capital adequacy ratio (CAR) for the GCC banks was estimated to be 16.5% in 2004. Banks in Oman and Qatar had a higher CAR. It could indeed be necessary for the GCC banks to maintain such high levels of capital, given the uncertain economic and geopolitical environment..

vi. High profitability
The GCC banks have shown consistently high financial performance in the past decade. They achieved an average return on assets of about 1.5%-2% during this period, which compares favorably with international standards. The most profitable banks are those in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and UAE. Strong profit generation has resulted from high margins, low cost of funds and labor, and the absence of income tax.

vii. Improving asset quality
Asset quality has improved in the recent years. Non-performing loans for banks across GCC have trended down in the last three years - more than halving from 7.9% of gross loans in 2001 to 3.5% of gross loans in 2004. Improving management of credit risk, limited appetite for the most risky sectors and products, satisfactory economic environment, and high liquidity of recent months have been at the root of this positive trend.

viii. Strong funding profile
The GCC banks have traditionally been characterized by strong funding profiles. The main source of funding so far has been customers' deposits. Customers' deposits have traditionally constituted a high proportion of the total liabilities of banks. The highly stable customer deposits have meant steady deposit-base and low cost of funds for the banks. But this is set to change. The banks' lending portfolios are experiencing a gradual increase in maturity following the rapid expansion of consumer loans accelerating the need for longer-term funds. Alternative funding is developing through certificates of deposits, syndication, and even international bond issues.

ix. High proportion of non-interest bearing deposits
The GCC banks have a key advantage in funding, that is, access to a large amount of non-interest-bearing deposits (NIBs). The main driving force behind the large amounts of NIBs, seems to be the religious tenets in Islam.

x. Healthy liquidity profile
The GCC banks have traditionally seen a healthy level of liquidity, partially as a result of the boom in oil prices in the 1970s, as well as a low level of leverage. Thus, the region's banks never had to compete fiercely to attract customer deposits. Another characteristic is the high stability of these deposits, despite periodic geopolitical pressures and recurrent episodes of strife in the region.

xi. Unrealized potential of corporate banking
Competition in corporate banking in GCC has been fierce for decades. But it has been a competitive, cyclical and narrow business line in the region. Consequently, the GCC banks' loan portfolios are still dominated by corporate and public sector loans. With the noticeable exception of Saudi Arabia, GCC corporate banking markets remain narrow, and attractive new deals are scarce. Despite several deterrents, there are good opportunities to provide far wider range of corporate banking products and to develop the small and midsize enterprise (SME) segment business. In their corporate banking business, most GCC banks suffer from a widening of maturity mismatches between funding and lending.

xii. Retail banking coming into its own
Banks in the GCC have benefited from the shift to retail banking on many fronts. Retail banking has been a profitable means of revenue diversification out of the more risky commercial banking, given the limited amount of risks it carries. It has also been a major stabilizer for banks' bottom lines through the business cycles, thus placing the GCC banks in a position to become more resilient to internal and external shocks. To cope with this, banks in the region have made heavy investments in conventional and electronic delivery channels, as well as in risk management systems and marketing know-how.

xiii. Mortgage lending in early stages
Mortgage credit is far less developed than other types of retail loans in GCC banks, because of the difficulties that banks have in initiating court proceedings and in foreclosing on residential real estate collateral..

xiv. Islamic banking
Islamic banks follow the Sharia principles. These banks have a clear competitive advantage over their conventional competitors. While conventional banks attract all kinds of depositors, Islamic banks' customers are more sensitive to the Islamic Sharia principles. As a result, Islamic banks have access to larger volumes of NIBs relative to their asset size, than do the conventional banks. This leads to very high spreads for the Islamic banks. The Islamic banks have also given rise to hybrid funding instruments. One such instrument is the 'profit-sharing investment account' (PSIA), which exhibits a combination of debt- and equity-like features in the same instrument.

xv. Nascent stage of capital markets
A limited role played by the capital markets, which are still at early stages of development, constraints the banks' ability to expand at a time when they must raise additional funds to meet their growing financing needs and increasing competition. Banks have so far met the bulk of the financing needs of companies active in the GCC region. Many family businesses are seeking listings on region's stock exchanges. More government companies are either being sold to the public or listed as possible candidates for privatization. In addition, new capital market laws are being implemented and existing laws strengthened to allow domestic companies to raise additional funds.

xvi. Benefit of high growth trajectory of GCC countries
All the six GCC countries have seen a high trajectory growth over the last two years. This has predominantly been on the back of high oil prices. Budget surpluses and growing populations have made the respective governments go for higher spending on infrastructure and utility projects. Big-ticket projects that have either been announced or are being executed benefit the banks in the region tremendously, as these offer the banks sizeable and profitable project financing avenues.

xvii. Strong systemic support by governments
Government support for banks is strong, reflecting the dominant role of the governments in the GCC economies. Besides the central banks offering liquidity support in times of need, the GCC governments have both injected capital and replaced doubtful loans with government bonds. This has been more so where the governments hold a major shareholding in the bank.

xviii. Poor disclosure levels
The GCC banks need to address some accounting- and disclosure-related issues. Shareholding structures are often undisclosed, details on impaired assets and provisioning policies remain limited, and Islamic banking accounting principles and practices lack regional standardization, which makes comparability with traditional banks difficult.

Asian giants join forces to face currency attacks

ISTANBUL: Japan, China and South Korea joined forces on Tuesday to bolster Asia's defences against attacks on its currencies, setting aside political tensions that had threatened to derail regional economic cooperation.

Finance ministers of Asia's largest economies agreed to closer cooperation on the Chiang Mai Initiative (CMI) - a regional foreign exchange swap pact to combat speculative runs on currencies like those that swept the region in 1997/98.

That sets the stage for their meeting on Wednesday with the Association of South East Asian Nations (Asean) which a senior Indonesian central banker said was likely to approve plans to double the size of the swap arrangement to over $US70 billion ($NZ97 billion).

"We are proposing to double the size. Right now the total fund is $US35.9 billion," Hartadi Sarwono, deputy Indonesian central bank governor, told Reuters.

The success of the plan depends almost entirely on the economic might of China, Japan and South Korea, among the world's biggest holders of foreign exchange reserves.

South Korean Finance Minister Han Duck-soo, who hosted the meeting of three Asian economic powerhouses, confirmed that there were plans to increase the size and scope of the swap pact.

The run-up to the meeting had been overshadowed by speculation about China's plans to reform its yuan currency and diplomatic disputes.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Relations between Japan and China plummeted to their lowest level in three decades in recent weeks over a series of disputes, including Tokyo's treatment of wartime history, which is also a bone of contention in ties with Seoul.

But Japanese Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki said the political rivals would pursue economic cooperation that is crucial to stability in the world's fastest growing region.

"Whatever happens, we need to promote financial cooperation even if there are issues," he said.

ADB officials said the tensions would not affect their role as guarantors of regional financial stability under the five-year-old Chiang Mai Initiative.

South Korea's Han said finance ministers of the Asean+3 wanted to revamp the process of throwing financial lifelines to countries in distress.

"We want a collective decision-making process...more transparency," he said.

Some Asian governments want to turn the web of swaps into a fledgling Asian monetary fund so the region is not dependent on the Western-dominated International Monetary Fund in times of crisis, as was the case in 1997-98.

Asia's massive $US2.5 trillion in foreign exchange reserves, about two-thirds of the world's total, has given the region more economic and political clout on the global stage.

But ADB officials warned that this mountain of hard currency would not always shelter economies from storms such as the Asian crisis in which capital fled the region, wiping away years of development in weeks.

The ADB's chief economist said Asia had even allowed its reserves to grow too large.

"They have grown far beyond what is (the) optimal level. It's basically a reflection of a lack of imagination, a lack of innovativeness and to some extent a lack of self-confidence," Ifzal Ali told Reuters.

Finance ministers and central bankers from dozens of Asian countries are converging on Istanbul for a three-day ADB meeting which begins on Wednesday.

Markets will wait for any comments at the news conference on currency policy, with speculation on a yuan revaluation reaching fever pitch after China's central bank governor said last month there were no serious political obstacles to yuan reform.

Han said the finance ministers from Japan, South Korea and China did not discuss the yuan in any detail.

Investors betting on an immediate change in the yuan regime scrambled to buy the Chinese currency in the offshore forward market in Europe as London dealing rooms re-opened after a market holiday on Monday.

The premium on three-month yuan non-deliverable forwards, derivatives used by foreign investors to bet on a change in China's currency, hit a record high to price in a 2.7 per cent rise in the yuan, which is pegged at 8.28 to the dollar.

China has said changes to its yuan policy would take into account any impact on Asian neighbours, who have been less strident in their demands for currency reform than the United States and Europe.

Beijing and Tokyo have moved to ease tensions after anti-Japanese protests across China last month appeared to threaten economic links worth $US212 billion in annual trade.

Automating camera surveillance for social control and military domination

By Andrew Kalukin Online Journal Contributing Writer

April 29, 2005-Though some organizations have objected to video surveillance of cities and borders, the public is less aware that recent computer vision innovations are making it possible to data mine surreptitiously acquired movie data in possible defiance of the Fourth Amendment.

The United States government has lavished generous funding upon video surveillance technology in hopes of revolutionary advances in data mining and robotic vision that would allow nationwide surveillance of public areas. Defense industries attempt to apply such technology to autonomous, robotic combat vehicles that can fight "bloodless" wars, ostensibly sparing the lives of American soldiers.

Controversial programs such as the Pentagon's Total Information Awareness program were renamed to escape the scrutiny of Congress and the public. Though the public alarm generated by 9/11 and the USA Patriot Act accelerated the implementation of surveillance technologies such as face recognition, research and development in automated video detection has spanned several decades.

Video surveillance technology and automated face recognition are already in place in major cities in the United States and Europe, sometimes with the approval of residents who have been induced to fear terrorism and crime more than surveillance. The obsession with surveillance has been demonstrated recently by the vigilantism of the Minutemen and the American Border Patrol, self-appointed border patrol agents who use, among other devices, cameras mounted on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to detect illegal immigrants from Mexico.

To a casual observer, surveillance cameras resemble lampposts. Some of the cameras have a 360 view and magnify by a factor of 10-17 compared to human sight at that range [1]. Some are equipped with night vision; they can zoom in on a target well enough to read text on a written page or look into a building.

In Washington, D.C., for example, most are placed at locations that would not come to mind as primary terrorist targets: Smithsonian Castle, L'Enfant Plaza, the U.S. Department of Labor, Dupont Circle, Union Station, Wisconsin Ave., the Old Post Office, the Banana Republic in Georgetown. Though the targets they view may not stand out as particularly vulnerable to terrorism, the cameras are placed strategically for the purpose of monitoring demonstrations and protests-one of the first occasions for their use was a demonstration in April 2000, against the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. Supplemental data from the U.S. Park police monitoring demonstrations by helicopter are sent as digital feed to the Metropolitan Police Department. The D.C. police, the FBI, the Secret Service, and the D.C. school system agreed to pool data together as needed [2]. Though the police have stated there are only a dozen cameras, these cameras can link to about a thousand other government cameras to make up a network of equipment that might be found in a NASA or defense command center [3].

Similar systems exist in other cities for the same purpose. During antiwar protests in Boston at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, the police informed the media that camera systems would be used to guard against acts of terrorism [4]. According to the antiwar organization A.N.S.W.E.R. (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism), photographs of protesters from past marches were circulated to bus drivers and other mass transit employees, to train the employees to recognize "terrorists." In Manhattan, a person walking on a street is always in view of at least one of 2,400 cameras [5]. Chicago officials plan to install by 2006 a highly advanced system of video surveillance that will alert the police to "suspicious" behavior: wandering aimlessly in circles, lingering outside a public building, or pulling over on a highway [6].

In reaction, privacy advocates who view these surveillance measures with alarm have begun to publish the locations of surveillance devices in major American cities, to allow others who object to the technology to chart surveillance-free paths through the streets. Even if someone were willing to take this precaution, there is no guarantee against hidden or fake cameras unaccounted for in planning the route.

The privacy issues surrounding CCTV become more complicated when computer vision technology is applied to surveillance. A controversy resulted in 2001 when authorities used face recognition technology and CCTV at a Tampa Bay Superbowl game to search for criminals and terrorists [7]. The action led to 19 arrests, all of them for petty crimes, with no record of whether these arrests were legitimate. The ensuing public furor led several legislators, such as Dick Armey, to propose laws for protecting privacy and regulating the use of biometric technology. Recent mass breaches of sensitive identification data by large information brokers such as ChoicePoint and LexisNexis imply possible serious compromises in future handling of surveillance data.

When the results of video searches are combined with other existing databases, powerful methods of identification and tracking become possible. Unique body marks make identification much easier. In Fort Worth, Texas, police can track gang members by applying a software package called "GangNet" [8]. By typing a description of tattoos into the database, the software can produce pictures of members wearing those tattoos; similar searches can be performed on nicknames, vehicle numbers, telephone numbers, or partial license plate numbers. Salinas, California, received federal funding for a Geographic Information System to carry out crime tracking of gangs [9]. In Manalapan, Florida-one of the nation's wealthiest cities-cameras and computers have been set up to run background checks on every car and driver that enters [10]. The system alerts a 911 dispatcher if the car is stolen or the driver is suspected of a crime. Infrared cameras record each car's license tag number, and other cameras photograph the driver.

Sensor mobility adds another dimension. In 2003, Ohio transportation officials began testing the use of unpiloted aircraft equipped with video, infrared cameras, and other sensors, to monitor traffic jams [11]. The information from aerial monitoring is intended to help police looking for the best route to an accident scene, as well as traffic planners, emergency workers, truck companies and commuters. Some of the planes-"drones"-are as small as model aircraft.

The military can use drones to send back real-time images of battle to commanders. In November 2003, the CIA used a drone to fire a missile into a car containing six alleged al-Qaida members. Unmanned aerial vehicles-UAVs-have attacked high-priority targets in Afghanistan and Iraq [12].

In December 2002, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner (R, VA) indicated interest in using drones for homeland security [13]. In January of 2003, as a cost-saving measure, a US Congressional Research Service report suggested replacing manned fighters flying combat air patrols (CAP) over US cities with UAVs armed with air-to-air missiles. It is unclear whether the FAA would have authority over the UAVs in such a program. Furthermore the UAVs may be too small to be seen and fly too low to be detected by radar; the possible use of UAVs to deliver biological and chemical attacks has been a concern of the federal government [14].

Though the cameras used in unmanned aircraft have been remotely piloted vehicles (RPVs) unequipped with artificial intelligence processing, efforts to develop robotic autonomous vehicles are being funded by DARPA [15]. The Future Combat Systems program of the army advertises as one of its missions the development of Reconnaissance and Surveillance Vehicles (RSVs) supporting advanced sensors that detect, track, locate, classify, and identify targets under all climatic conditions, day or night.

Military and local law enforcement agencies already use video surveillance to automate threat response. In Broward County, Florida, Port Everglades selected ObjectVideo VEW software to protect its perimeter [16]. The software contains a tripwire feature that allows security personnel to create virtual perimeters on land and water by drawing a box on a digital view of what the camera is observing. Unknown people or vehicles crossing the tripwire boundaries signal an alert.

Archival video data are vulnerable to the same trends in industry and government that have led to information being sold as a commodity. Information about individuals is sold and traded routinely for marketing, charity solicitations, and political polling. Individuals may find more difficulty controlling the distribution of archived surveillance imagery, where the data are more likely to be collected surreptitiously. The breakdown of privacy in the trade of personal information already makes it possible for government agencies, such as the FBI, to bypass the government ban against information collection for people who are not targets of investigation, by simply accessing personal information that is already commercially available.

Some of the controversies of video surveillance came to public attention during the congressional discussion of the proposed Total Information Awareness (TIA) research programs of the Pentagon. Several research programs in TIA exploited video pattern recognition. HumanID included research projects to recognize humans from a distance based on face and gait recognition, along with other biometric tools. Though public outcry caused the TIA budget to be canceled by Congress in September 2003, some of the programs continued under other cover, such as Novel Intelligence from Massive Data (NIMD), Non-Obvious Relationship Awareness (NORA), Adaptive Concept Understanding from Modeled Enterprise Networks (ACUMEN), Computer-Assisted Passenger Prescreening System (CAPPS II), and Multi-state Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange (MATRIX).

Among the pattern matching efforts was a project known as Video Analysis and Content Exploitation (VACE). The goal of VACE was automatic content detection and recognition in "video scenes of various indoor and outdoor activities involving people, meetings, and vehicles, and TV news broadcasts," according to the Advanced Research and Development Activity (ARDA) website. Research goals included recognition of people, event detection and understanding, video query, multi-modal video data mining, and object identification from motion. The VACE solicitations have closed, but as of December 2003, plans for workshops in VACE and other programs were still on the calendar for 2004.

Another military project for widespread video collection was offered as a DARPA BAA solicitation in May 2003-Combat zones That See (CTS). The goal of CTS is to develop video understanding of multiple data feeds arriving from many sources, to support military operations in urban terrain. The military is interested in tracking vehicles moving from one camera location to another. It is easy to see that the same techniques will be useful for tracking individuals walking across a city.

The ability to extract information from video images is so widely sought in the scientific community that the complete discontinuation of funding for similar programs seems unimaginable. The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency has plans to post solicitations for geospatial information visualization and to award $2.5 million in FY05 and FY06.

Military applications of pattern recognition and video data mining continue to be developed by means of Department of Defense solicitations to contractors in the form of BAA, SBIR, and STTR awards. These programs include efforts at automating algorithms for detecting human intentions in subjects appearing in video films, for distinguishing decoys from targets, and for synchronizing many UAVs to carry out simultaneous reconnaissance and attack.

It is possible that in the future, covert or privatized TIA-like programs may escape the scrutiny of Congress. It also seems certain that computer vision will find increasing applications in autonomous vehicles, and that efforts will be made to find the limits in the abilities of robotic devices to carry out automated warfare.

Though video surveillance is a passive activity, the data mining of video records to profile individuals is surreptitiously invasive. Given the difficulty of detecting video surveillance systems hidden on the ground or in the air, it would be difficult to enforce restraints against misuse of such data by either private agents or governments. Most cameras and UAVs are invisible to casual observers. Though the components of surveillance equipment and software are cheap, the infrastructure to support exchanges of information across many databases and networks could be afforded only by large corporations or government institutions-this implies a potentially asymmetrical situation in which surveillance becomes a weapon of class warfare [17]. Hierarchies of privilege favoring race or class are built implicitly into existing surveillance systems-for example, homeless residents of a city are more often targeted by video surveillance systems than are other citizens.

Recent developments in computer vision, robotics