Wireless Industry Defends RFID for Passports

By Gene J. Koprowski
www.CRMBuyer.com
Part of the ECT News Network

04/25/05 5:00 AM PT

The Department of State is not calling the passports RFID-enabled; rather, it calls them
"contactless smart-cards." Leading privacy rights groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation
(EFF), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and some conservative religious groups are speaking
out against the technology.

The wireless industry is mounting a very public defense for a controversial application of
"contactless smart cards" while a number of consumer groups and privacy advocates have decried the
technology as potentially invasive of personal privacy.

Former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Tom Ridge said at a conference in Chicago
this month that Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology for passports and similar
contactless smart cards for IDs "will make us safer" by helping security personnel verify a
traveler's or visitor's identity.

Ridge, now on the board of directors of RFID maker and DHS contractor Savi Technology, told audience
members at the RFID Journal Live conference that government tests to use RFID and smart-card
technology to identify passengers and cargo at airports were a "success" and that the Feds will
safeguard the data gathered.

Name Games

The government is now moving forward with plans to insert RFID-like chips into all new American
passports beginning later this year, and, perhaps even sooner, into government employee ID cards as
well. The cards, which will have a flash memory similar to that of a PDA , will include the
traveler's name, date of birth, city of origin and other identifying information, like a digital
picture or digital fingerprints.

The Department of State is not calling the passports RFID-enabled; rather, it calls them
"contactless smart-cards." Leading privacy rights groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation
(EFF) , the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and some conservative
religious groups are speaking out against the technology.

"The DHS is playing a name game in response to the incessant noise of the privacy advocates, banging
on pots and pans," said Robert Siciliano, a personal security and identity theft expert, who
authored "The Safety Minute: 0:01."

"The DHS is playing the name game partly because a religious group, Resistance for Christ, is
calling for a boycott of radio frequency identification systems. Evoking the revelations of the
Apostle John, Resistance for Christ warns that RFID tags may be the precursor to the universal
identification known in biblical prophecy as 'The Mark of the Beast.'"

The positions of the religious group have been reported online by Agape Press
. Agape is the Biblical Greek word for "love."

Electronic Pickpockets?

Other critics are concerned that the contactless smart-cards and RFID technologies used in ID cards
could make it easy for ID thieves to target travelers. They believe that ID thieves will outfit
themselves with portable scanners and electronically pick the pockets of those they target.

Siciliano reckons that the privacy and religious groups opposing the cards are in grievous error.
"The battle at hand is properly identifying who's who," he said.

The contactless smart cards contain a digital signature algorithm -- a complex mathematical
formula -- that makes it difficult to counterfeit other cards using the data from the original card.
Some security experts have said that the digital signature affords integrity to the data.

Passive Tech

This technology is passive -- meaning the cards don't have a power source in them. All the power
comes from the induction of the magnetic field generated by the device that reads the chips.

International travelers will present their passport to the border agent at customs, who will simply
run them over a card reader, in the same way that a checkout clerk runs an item over a scanner at
the supermarket.

Major manufacturers like Philips
(NYSE: PHG)
Semiconductors, On Track Innovations, Ltd. and others are involved in the field. "The primary driver
of RFID has been mainstream products," said Manuel Albers, director of business development, Philips
Semiconductors.

Philips believes there is a lot of confusion over the differences between RFID chips and the smart
cards. But critics believe that the technologies are essentially the same, and are concerned, they
say, about potential misuses of the technology, including ID theft.

New ID Cards

The Department of Homeland Security is planning to issue the contactless smart-cards to its
employees in the form of new identification cards. The new cards, which will include digital images
of fingerprints, will be used to increase the efficiency of DHS workers. The DHS workers are being
issued the ID cards as part of a directive signed by President Bush.

The cards can come in several varieties, according to a spokesman for TopCoder, Inc., including
read-only, read-write and digital signal transponder. The most advanced cards are the digital signal
transponders. The interactive read-write programming of the card provides a significant advantage
for security personnel tracking and restricted access applications, like airplane cockpits.

The card readers have a very limited range -- 100 centimeters. There have been test cases of the
efficiency of the readers in the field. The government of Israel is a major proponent of the
technology, and has hired On Track Innovations, a developer of contactless tags, as a prime
contractor.

Customs agents and other security personnel will continue to look at the picture of a person on
their passport, or ID, and compare it to the person presenting the travel document, as a failsafe
measure. But the controversy over the technology in these applications -- as contrasted with the use
of RFID in logistics and retailing -- will continue. "DHS avoids the term 'RF' [radio frequency]
like the plague," said Siciliano.

technewsworld.com